An on-going conversation with cooperative networks of conscious particles through the focal point of Heartstone.
Gary R Smith Heartstone, we've been referring to 'cooperative networks of conscious particles.' In what ways are particles cooperative?
Heartstone Look at the branch of a tree. Feel it on the particle plane.
Notice how it branches and leaves. See where its particles end and the air particles begin. Notice that on the particle plane the borders are soft and blended between branch particles and those of the air. What holds the branch into its shape?
The response to this question from the particle nets will be different from the answers of science. The principles and laws of science are accurate from a scientific point of view. They describe what can be observed from 'outside' the object of observation. They start from an assumption that Man is separated from Nature. That is accurate also — in that the perspective makes it so.
From the perspective of the nets, the laws and principles of science describe the cooperative agreements of the conscious particles which form the single living being of all that is, the One Being. Our answer to 'What holds the branch into its shape?' is 'the cooperative agreements of conscious particles.'
Our meaning of the word 'particles' is similar to, but not exactly the same as, the scientific definition. To us, particles from a human standpoint are fundamental units of existence which combine to compose something new. They are outside the range of unaided human physical senses and therefore cannot be directly observed. They can only be directly experienced over intuitive feeling.
Your modern science says that the world is governed by natural laws.
What you call natural laws are agreements and cooperation on the particle plane to fulfill ideas generated by the Whole Net. The particles cooperate to serve a design they created.
Gary R Smith My education in science is what was taught in K - 12. I was more interested in metaphysics than in physics, in high school. However, metaphysics has its shortcomings, contradictions and fallacies as well.
While science brings apparent benefits, it is one-sided and limited in perspective. It claims to be objective, but objectivity is impossible.
Scientific objectivity is an ideal goal that scientists strive to achieve. Unfortunately, because science is a human enterprise, complete objectivity can never be attained.... - Rational Wiki
A fundamental subjectivity of science is the assumption that Man is separate from Nature. It is a premise upon which science is built. The more objective the scientist attempts to be, the further he/she removes himself/herself from the object of observation. This method has increased human understanding, but at the high cost of separating humanity from the Whole of life. Science creates incomplete knowledge which appears to be complete and outcomes which appear beneficial but in the larger picture are disastrous because they do not consider the Whole.
'Scientific objectivity is a characteristic of scientific claims, methods and results. It expresses the idea that the claims, methods and results of science are not, or should not be influenced by particular perspectives, value commitments, community bias or personal interests, to name a few relevant factors. Objectivity is often considered as an ideal for scientific inquiry, as a good reason for valuing scientific knowledge, and as the basis of the authority of science in society.
'The idea of this first conception of objectivity is that scientific claims are objective in so far as they faithfully describe facts about the world. The philosophical rationale underlying this conception of objectivity is the view that there are facts “out there” in the world and that it is the task of a scientist to discover, to analyze and to systematize them. “Objective” then becomes a success word: if a claim is objective, it successfully captures some feature of the world.
'In this view, science is objective to the degree that it succeeds at discovering and generalizing facts, abstracting from the perspective of the individual scientist. '
Heartstone, when I walked with the compost buckets two days ago, I was aware of the atoms of the bucket and the molecules of the compost and my surroundings, as a harmonious whole. I felt I was experiencing life as it happens, a feeling which I cannot adequately put into words. It was without the use of any substance or trying to make it happen.
I have experienced expansion and resonance, but not before such expanded awareness and harmonious flow which included particles. To live in this always would be an incredible step. It seems essential, to have such felt experience. Otherwise, all discussion of particles becomes abstract and conceptual. I still 'go into my head' when writing about particles, while my yearning is to have the felt experience.
Heartstone All we can tell you at this point is to continue your journey as you are. You are self-regulating. You see your imbalances and bring them to balance. You grow in self-trust. As you raise your level of consciousness, you will attract into your life all that is needed, each step of the way.
Gary R Smith Last night I felt guided by intuition to Heart Breathe, using deep diaphragm breathing. I would fill with air from the diaphragm bottom to the very top of my lungs, expanding my chest, feeling the words and exhaling very slowly while toning:
Inhale 'I am tuned to the Whole Net.'
Exhale Tone long 'A'.
Inhale 'I am tuned to the One Being.'
Exhale Tone long 'O'.
Inhale 'I feel connection with the Whole Net.'
Exhale Tone long 'A'.
Inhale 'I serve the One Being.'
Exhale Tone long 'O'.
During the prolonged toning, it was as though the Whole Net was toning through my body. It was very powerful. I have felt stronger all day today while in 100 degree heat.