Posted in the Practical Metaphysics discussion group on Facebook.
I asked Heartstone about Marcel B.'s comments (Killing by Agreement?), and then about his statement indicating it is impossible to kill anything without there already being an underlying agreement -- below the awareness of the killer.
It was the end of the day, I was exhausted, the transmissions came faster than I could write, and pieces were soon forgotten. At first my questions to Heartstone were not well-formed, and all of this contributed to a more piecemeal response.
In general, the Heartstone transmissions are a mixture with my pre-existing feelings. I can often discern when the words coming are formed from beyond my psyche. The best way I can currently describe it is a subtle shift in frequency. Heartstone told me earlier that they use my 'brain database' to compose their message.
There is repetition in the following words. I am posting it pretty much as it came to me. Everything has to be filtered through the reader's own discernment.
Communicating with the cooperative networks of conscious particles, using a stone or other natural object as a focal point, is an in-born human capacity. In other words, I believe anyone can do this with the same heart intent.
This is what 'Heartstone said':
The past is a memory. The future is a projection. Both are movements along a timeline.
The present moment is stillness.
Stillness = timelessness Motion = time and space
Any wave is a disturbance in a medium (not to be confused with a disturbance having an emotional charge.) Motion is a disturbance in the medium of stillness.
The disturbance called motion creates waves. The waves are electro-magnetic frequencies. The waves create time and space.
Dynamic stillness is the unmoved mover. Living in the present moment is merging with the dynamic stillness, with the unmoved mover.
The high frequency oscillation between stillness and motion creates time and space.
Time and space, a disturbance in the present moment, is upheld by its own frequencies generated by the unmoved mover.
Time and space, the waves created by the disturbance in stillness, creates particles which act like waves.
The high frequency waves emitted by the movement of stillness, creates particles and sets in motion all that is perceived by humans.
The particle universe, motion imbued with stillness, has evolved forces and laws which humans call natural.
Humans are an outgrowth of particle evolution, biological organisms with the unique potential of merging consciously with stillness-consciousness.
Humans have evolved from particles a quality which is called 'free will.' It is this quality which enables humans to separate from consciousness. The same quality gives humans a choice to return to stillness.
Humans are a rebellion against their creator.
Nothing can in actuality be outside or apart from stillness, the creator, as it is the medium in which everything exists. Humans are a dissonance in the motion waves generated by the unmoved mover.
In the natural laws of the particle nets, the whole net, every action is by an agreement which occurs over frequency alignments.
From the perspective of stillness-consciousness and the whole net of cooperative conscious particles, earth and its inhabitants are a rebellious alternate reality, yet connected and part of the whole.
It is a rebellion occurring in the medium of stillness. The rebellion, from particle consciousness to human awareness, is at a frequency which is dissonant with the whole net.
The human brain attempts to replicate and replace the consciousness of it origin.
Under the self-made laws of the rebellion, unconscious humans kill without regard for the natural laws of the whole net, including agreement. In the case of earth, underlying agreement does not occur automatically.
Unconscious humans kill without regard for the universal laws and are deeply a dissonance within the frequency fabric of stillness-consciousness.
Conscious humans may kill with an actual telepathic agreement with whatever they kill (or manipulate.) In that case, it is not that humans cannot (or that it is impossible to) kill without the agreement of the to-be-killed, but that they have a free will choice to kill only if they have the actual, conscious (telepathic) agreement of their intended target.
The humans of the rebellion have a free will choice to return to the original stillness-motion which creates them and to the particle networks of time and space which serve the creator.
Stillness is motionless. Without motion, time and space would cease to exist. Stillness is the medium through which motion moves. Without stillness, time and space would have no foundation.
The high frequency oscillation between stillness and motion creates all that is.
Is it impossible for a human to kill anything without there first being an underlying agreement? The human rebellion has generated a substrate, an alternate reality in which such actual agreement is not binding. In this alternate reality, killings can and often do occur without the agreements which govern the harmonious universe.
The healing of this rift will begin when humans use their power of free will to act only in alignment with the dynamic stillness of the present moment, and with conscious agreements (telepathic or expressed) in all their inter-actions.
Alex Stanley This distinction between the conscious and unconscious killer does resonate with me.
But so does the idea that beyond consciousness, there is a "contract" we all agree to before or during our stay here.
I love this post!! Just love it. ❤
Thank you. ❤❤
Gary R Smith Alex Stanley,
In response to your comment, 'beyond consciousness, there is a "contract" we all agree to before or during our stay here.' --
Yes, and in earlier conversations Heartstone mentioned that what we call natural laws are agreements within the 'nets.' Elements behave as they do because they have agreed to those behaviors. As to humans, well, one of the contracts may be an agreement to free will. It is almost as though we live in an amusement park which operates by standards (human society and the conditioned mind) other than the region which surrounds it (the natural universe).
I feel my life has been pre-dispositioned by what attracts and repels me and by events of destiny. The meeting with my life partner feels destined, and we both feel it was contracted before we incarnated. I can see that in general, our pre-incarnated core essence or soul made contracts before appearing in human bodies -- and maybe most of us did not know fully what we were getting into!
It could even be that in some cases a soul contracted to be killed. My questioning of Marcel B.'s premise is around its global perspective -- that all killing involves a pre-arranged agreement.
My younger brother Mark was killed by a drunk driver. A few weeks before, he wrote a song which certainly could be interpreted as his knowing at a deeper level that the time of a pre-arranged contract was upon him. But, not all killings involve an automatic agreement. That is my take on it. Mark's song follows.
In a recorded cassette letter, my younger brother Mark told of sitting on a high ridge in the Rockies at sunset, writing songs and playing guitar.
A few weeks later, Mark was hit by a drunk driver and died at age seventeen.
The words of the song were found in his room. He called it 'Stargazing Wanderer':
Stargazing Wanderer by Mark Jonathan Smith The mountain is conquered, my sky is red.
Peaceful giant, and nothin’s said.
Star-gazing wanderer is what I am. Eternal heaven grasps my mind
and carries it to a starburst field of flowers. Can’t count the hours.
And the ebony god grants a vision, my soul is arisen.
Flightless clouds in timeless night suspend me with them.
Such unearthly delight is mine. Perhaps a sign.
Silver threads of a golden dream surround me. My being will be free.
- Mark Jonathan Smith 1957-1974
Mona Ahmad I got a very very similar down load just today... Sharing...
I'm sure you can sense the rhythm of the message being similar
I completely agree that the messages are filtered through our individual discernment.
I find the resonance of the patterns and waves that come in through different channels and find them in the same orchestra
'By focusing on what we want We focus on the past or future
By focusing on what we don't want We focus on the past or future
Sometimes we want and don't want All at once All the time
And then we wonder How can time be a construct of my mind
It is because We create it all the time
In the now Desire is irrelevant Its right there
And time is irrelevant Want/don't want is irrelevant Thus the past and future are irrelevant
We are so much fun x
How can we see ourselves If we can't see ourselves If we can't see ourselves Then how can we see ourselves