Do you have interest in watching a very intelligent half-hour unHerd YouTube on the larger social picture of the mandates and lockdowns? Not conspiracy or fear-based, this interview offers an honest, refreshing and insightful view. These are some of my notes on the video:
• Coercive measures that divide people
• Technological tyranny
• Social credit system
• Issues of trust and mistrust
• A proxy for a larger picture
• Conversations between thesis and anti-thesis people
• Is it a debate of science or spirit... the 'higher meaning of society'?
• An opportunity to explore, and keep the debate higher
• Listen to each other with kindness
I especially love the ending which delves into the deeper meaning of the world events, and the spiritual opportunities they present. My spiritual focus has become this, to guide my mind through these times:
All praise to the Source I Am, the Unity, the all-inclusive One.
All gratitude for AllThatIs, as it is, and for WhatIsNot.
All that I Am, and ever will be, is Love for Love Itself.
All surrendering to the One, I relax into the Source I Am.
All connection with the Unity feeling, the Source I Am acts through me.
Comments were made on the video, quoted here in part:
The difference beyond world operating systems of religion, politics, and technology is the SPIRIT within each person being the New System powered by Love Energy, to be in touch with Source Knowledge.
"...This [pandemic] event has been a huge spiritual battle and I see it as a catalyst for many to awaken out of their human fear-based mode into a higher awareness of being. There is an awakening happening and those in power fear the awakening more than any virus...."
NOTE: A bug in my web hosting service sometimes replaces my chosen images with random ones pulled from my iPad. This time, rather than fighting with the Weebly app, I decided to leave the random image because it actually fits with the post.
Hi Gary, I'm posting this one because I think it will fit in with the focus of our group. I'm usually hesitant in posting things that may have deep opposition, but I think this video has a more realistic approach taken.
There is nothing wrong with having different view-points about difficult subjects, and it is even helpful sometimes to enlarge our own understanding of a subject.
I just got done listening to this video and found it most helpful to understand what is really going on with the division of taking the vaccine or not, and all of the issues around it. The speaker isn't really taking sides but explaining what is the root causes of the division among society. It has a lot deeper core underlining.
Both sides of the issue are fearful of losing their old way of life. And life is changing rapidly. People feel out of control and fearful, and don't seem to have a common direction or understanding of where we are going.
I think the only true way out of the direction we are going is for humanity to come to a greater sense of who we are and why we are here. This comes with a greater sense of spirituality, and the truth of who we are, if I can use those words.
I think it is worth the time to listen to this 34 minute video. If a person listen to the core understanding of what the author is saying there isn't really a disagreement being presented.
Thanks for sharing, Gary. MEMBERS, please make helpful responses to this message that might help all of us realize what is truly happening in our world these days. Thanks for sharing your own wisdom and insights into this issue we are all facing.
Larry, your thoughtful response is much appreciated. The video could be controversial, of course, especially if watched with prejudice. But if it is heard from a quiet space within, or as the interview says, listened to with kindness, there can be respect for the honest perspectives presented. It may be considered (by me) a call to expanded awareness and presence of mind, but not to activism or dualism. May I add your comment to my post?
Comments in [brackets] below are by my friend, Hal.
I enjoyed that you responded and apparently watched the video, old friend. My wish would be that you and I could continue a friendly and open conversation about it, without be offended or withdrawing.
I was outspoken earlier about the events and saw how I went overboard with my conspiracy views while trying to get to the roots of the issues.
Some aspects of my early views though, about a larger agenda related to the imposition of an ideology and lifestyle seem truer and more clear to me than before. I avoid judging, blaming or discerning motives.
The gentlemen of the interview seem to me the most balanced. As concluded there, to vaccinate oneself or not should be a personal decision.
Surely we should be able to explore and discuss our individual views, and listen to each other with kindness. Just because your experience and mine are different doesn't mean one is more valid than another.
My nephew and his family all tested positive and had the symptoms of a flu. They all fully recovered and now have natural immunity. I take preventative steps to improve my immunity with natural methods.
The last time I was in a hospital as a patient was over fifty years ago. I cannot imagine surrendering myself to the medical system over a virus but of course would consider how my choices could impact others. I do believe in social responsibility.
There is much evidence to suggest that the vaccinated actually help spread the virus and that many of them suffer severe side effects.
There's more on this on my website, in the blog post titled 'Cull.'
With deep respect and appreciation for you, I wish you the best.
Hal J Boyd
[I spent another week in bed and extreme discomfort at home. Was it COVID? I don't know.]
Did you get a test afterwards for natural immunity?
[Yes, you are free to choose whether you want to be vaccinated or not. ]
What would you say is your main issue or grievance with the unvaccinated?
[I know the concern is, in part, about culling the population. What I see actually happening is that this is the ones being culled are those who choose not to vaccinate. ]
Dr. Vernon Coleman is a salty old guy whose opinions are a bit overly dramatized for my taste, still I include his observations in the mix of how I view the current events and keep a safe distance from them. He wrote in part,
"A couple of hours ago Darren Smith, the editor of the excellent The Light Paper, sent me a paper from the medical journal Circulation which proves that the covid-19 jabbing experiment has to stop today....
The journal Circulation is a well-respected publication. It’s 71-years-old, its articles are peer reviewed and in one survey it was rated the world’s no 1 journal in the cardiac and cardiovascular system category.
I’m going to quote the final sentence of the abstract which appears at the beginning of the article. This is all I, you – or anyone else – needs to know.
`We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy and other vascular events following vaccination....'
The jab is not a vaccine. It is an experimental treatment which aggressively affects a person's DNA.
[You have to wear a seatbelt when you drive a car. ]
Yes, and since both my brothers were wearing seatbelts when they died in car accidents, for years I refused to wear them. Each time I got a car, the first thing I did was take out the seatbelts. I didn't give a damn about the statistics of saving lives. But after someone pointed out to me that not wearing my seatbelt raised insurance costs for everyone, I recognized my social responsibility and starting wearing them religiously.
[You seem to suggest that those who catch the virus seldom die and, as a result, they become naturally immune while those who get vaccinated become carriers with severe side effects. You seem to suggest that catching COVID and surviving provides eternal immunity. ]
It was not my intention to suggest either of those things, Hal.
Hal J Boyd
1) here in western Michigan, many of them are close to being violent towards those who don't share their views and they become verbally and sometimes physically abusive,
I believe what you are telling me, Hal, but it makes no sense that the unvaccinated would behave that way. There is something more to this? The unvaccinated are reacting to being told or pressured to vaccinate?
[3) their belief that if they choose not to get vaccinated, and usually it goes hand-in-hand with their choice not to wear a mask, that they should still be able to go about their business without concern for others, e.g. standing close, coughing and sneezing.]
Of course, it would not feel right to me to behave the way you describe, and I've not experienced that behavior in the unvaccinated.
I always wear a mask in public, practice social distancing, and am very aware of being considerate of others. On the plane from Boston to the Azores, I nearly fainted from wearing a mask because it's very hard for me to breathe in it. A doctor in Germany told me I am pre-asthmatic. An American doctor said there's no such thing as pre-asthmatic, you either are or you are not. But I still wear a mask in public.
[It's a seeming unwillingness to accept the consequences of their choices. ]
Couldn't we say that about several different groups of people, if we wanted to generalize?
[Private establishments can choose not to serve them.]
Yes, they can. And customers can choose not to frequent those places. Choices will determine how things shake out. Why do you think so many front line healthcare workers are leaving their jobs at great personal risk? Possibly because they see what is really happening?
[The government can place restrictions that are felt to benefit the greater population. ]
Wouldn't it be sweet if there was no corruption, no bribery, no political ambitions to undermine beneficial motives.
[I don't share the vision that this is some intended plan to control the population for the benefit of the elites.]
Where have vast amounts of wealth moved since the pandemic began?
Great discussion. The core of human problems is thinking we are human. If the egoic mind is in control, all kinds of horrors will insue. This is why the Bill of Rights and Constitution of US are so important to protect and maintain as they acknowledge something more than just the human, material aspect of life. Fear feeds the ego and suppresses spirit. However the more you try to suppress spirit, the more it wants to come to light. For this apparent one, this covid event has been a huge spiritual battle and I see it as a catalyst for many to awaken out of their human fear based mode into a higher awareness of being. There is an awakening happening and the those in power fear the awakening more than any virus.